Abstract :
This paper meticulously dissects the multifarious subfields that comprise the expansive domain of political science. It furnishes an erudite exposition of political theory, public policy, international relations, comparative politics, political behavior, political economy, environmental politics, gender and politics, global governance, human rights, political communication, and security studies. Each of these subfields is scrutinized with a discerning eye, extracting nuanced theoretical constructs and practical exemplifications drawn from diverse global contexts. In the realm of political theory, the paper embarks on a journey through ten pivotal political doctrines, unraveling their practical manifestations in the real world. The intricate tapestry of public policy is laid bare through a meticulous analysis of policy-making procedures, thereby offering profound insights into the confluence of governance and policymaking. International relations are elucidated by probing the intricate interplay between states and international actors, encompassing non-state entities and global organizations. Comparative politics, in turn, casts its gaze upon the intricate political systems and structures of regions as varied as South America, Africa, and Europe, fostering an understanding of the rich tapestry of global governance paradigms. Political behavior is unveiled through a meticulous examination of the attitudes, convictions, and actions of political actors. Political economics unfurls the nexus between politics and economics, probing the influence of economic policies on political systems. Environmental politics delves into the intricate politics surrounding the environment, delineating the repercussions of environmental regulations on political landscapes. This paper thus offers a perspicacious overview of diverse political science subfields, buttressed by real-world illustrations. While it undeniably enriches our understanding, its inherent limitations necessitate further inquiry to plumb the depths of these complex domains. Nonetheless, this study serves as an invaluable resource, bestowing profound insights that can edify scholars, policymakers, and the informed citizenry alike.

Keywords :
Comparative Politics, Human Rights, International Relations, Political Behaviour, Political Economy, Political Science, Political Theory, Public Policy.

–

References :

• Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2009). Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction. In Non-Western international relations theory (pp. 11-35): Routledge.
• Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground: Constructivism in world politics. European journal of international relations, 3(3), 319-363.
• Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53-80.
• Almond, G. A. (1974). Comparative politics today, 9/e: Pearson Education India.
• Archibugi, D., Held, D., & Köhler, M. (1998). Re-imagining political community: studies in cosmopolitan democracy: Stanford University Press.
• Arts, B. (2003). Non-state actors in global governance: three faces of power.
• Avant, D. D., Finnemore, M., & Sell, S. K. (2010). Who governs the globe? (Vol. 114): Cambridge University Press.
• Ba, A. D., & Hoffmann, M. J. (2005). Contending perspectives on global governance: coherence, contestation and world order: Psychology Press.
• Badie, B., Berg-Schlosser, D., & Morlino, L. (2011). International encyclopedia of political science (Vol. 1): Sage.
• Balaam, D. N., & Dillman, B. (2018). Introduction to international political economy: Routledge.
• Balzacq, T. (2005). The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European journal of international relations, 11(2), 171-201.
• Beck, U. (2005). Power in the global age: A new global political economy: Polity.
• Bennett, W. L. (1998). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. PS: Political Science & Politics, 31(4), 741-761.
• Bennett, W. L., & Entman, R. M. (2000). Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy: Cambridge University Press.
• Berg-Schlosser, D., Morlino, L. A., & Badie, B. (2020). The SAGE handbook of political science. The SAGE Handbook of Political Science, 1-1776.
• Bernstein, S. (2011). Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18(1), 17-51.
• Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power: Cambridge University Press.
• Birkland, T. A. (2019). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making: Routledge.
• Booth, K., & Erskine, T. (2016). International relations theory today: John Wiley & Sons.
• Booth, K., & Wheeler, N. (2008). The security dilemma. Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bratton, M. (1994). Civil society and political transition in Africa.
• Breuning, J. T. I. M. (2011). 21st Century POLITICAL SCIENCE.
• Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2009). Understanding international relations: Springer.
• Bull, B., & McNeill, D. (2007). Development issues in global governance: Public-private partnerships and market multilateralism: Routledge.
• Burnell, P. J., Rakner, L., & Randall, V. (2017). Politics in the developing world: Oxford University Press.
• Burton, J. W. (1972). World society: Cambridge University Press.
• Buzan, B. (2008). People, states & fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-cold war era: ECPR press.
• Cardenas, S. (2004). Norm collision: Explaining the effects of international human rights pressure on state behavior. International Studies Review, 6(2), 213-231.
• Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The aNNalS of the american academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78-93.
• Cerny, P. G. (2010). Rethinking world politics: A theory of transnational neopluralism: OUP USA.
• Chen, C.-a. (2021). Christopher Andrä-Hampf holds a MA in Political Science and East Asian Studies with a focus on Chinese military modernisation. His research interests include regional security policies and the evolution of regional military strategic thinking. He is currently working as a research assistant at the German Armed Force’s Command & Staff College. Taiwan During the First Administration of Tsai Ing-wen: Navigating in Stormy Waters.
• Chilcote, R. H. (2018). Theories of comparative politics: the search for a paradigm reconsidered: Routledge.
• Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice: routledge.
• Clapp, J., & Dauvergne, P. (2011). Paths to a green world: The political economy of the global environment: MIT press.
• Clark, A. M., Friedman, E. J., & Hochstetler, K. (1998). The sovereign limits of global civil society: a comparison of NGO participation in UN world conferences on the environment, human rights, and women. World politics, 51(1), 1-35.
• Clark, B. (2016). Political economy: A comparative approach: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
• Cooley, A., & Ron, J. (2002). The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. International security, 27(1), 5-39.
• Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. Millennium, 10(2), 126-155.
• Cox, R. W. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method. Millennium, 12(2), 162-175.
• Cox, R. W., & Sinclair, T. J. (1996). Approaches to world order.
• Curini, L. (2020). The SAGE handbook of research methods in political science and international relations: Sage.
• Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political communication, 22(2), 147-162.
• Dalton, R. J. (2013). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies: Cq Press.
• Della Porta, D., & Kriesi, H. (1999). Social movements in a globalizing world: An introduction. In Social movements in a globalizing world (pp. 3-22): Springer.
• Dellmuth, L. M., & Tallberg, J. (2021). Elite communication and the popular legitimacy of international organizations. British journal of political science, 51(3), 1292-1313.
• Draper, T. (2017). American business and public policy: The politics of foreign trade: Routledge.
• Duffield, M. (2014). Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Dupuy, K. E., Ron, J., & Prakash, A. (2015). Who survived? Ethiopia’s regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs. Review of International Political Economy, 22(2), 419-456.
• Falleti, T. G., & Lynch, J. F. (2009). Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comparative political studies, 42(9), 1143-1166.
• Finger, M., & Princen, T. (2013). Environmental NGOs in world politics: linking the local and the global: Routledge.
• Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: the constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual review of political science, 4(1), 391-416.
• Gill, S. (1995). Globalisation, market civilisation, and disciplinary neoliberalism. Millennium, 24(3), 399-423.
• Goemans, H. E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Chiozza, G. (2009). Introducing Archigos: A dataset of political leaders. Journal of Peace research, 46(2), 269-283.
• Goldstein, J. S. (2008). International relations: Pearson Education India.
• Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2013). The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British journal of political science, 43(3), 673-701.
• Guiraudon, V., & Lahav, G. (2000). A reappraisal of the state sovereignty debate: The case of migration control. Comparative political studies, 33(2), 163-195.
• Guzzini, S. (2013). Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: the continuing story of a death foretold: Routledge.
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage: OUP Oxford.
• Hall, R. B., & Biersteker, T. J. (2002). The emergence of private authority in global governance (Vol. 85): Cambridge University Press.
• Hamilton, M., & Rhodes, R. (2008). Australian Political Science: Journal and Publisher Rankings. In.
• Haussman, M. (2005). Abortion Politics in North America: Lynne Rienner Publishers Boulder, CO.
• Haynes, J. (2014). An introduction to international relations and religion: Routledge.
• Held, D. (1992). Democracy: from city‐states to a cosmopolitan order? Political studies, 40, 10-39.
• Held, D. (2013). Global covenant: The social democratic alternative to the Washington consensus: John Wiley & Sons.
• Heywood, A. (2014). Global politics: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. (2012). The civic origins of progressive policy change: Combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 548-569.
• Hulme, D. (2012). Global poverty: How global governance is failing the poor: Routledge.
• Immergut, E. M. (1998). The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics & society, 26(1), 5-34.
• Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world: Cambridge University Press.
• Ishiyama, J., Miller, W. J., & Simon, E. (2015). Handbook on teaching and learning in political science and international relations: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Ishiyama, J. T., & Breuning, M. (2011). 21st century political science: A reference handbook (Vol. 1): Sage.
• Jackson, R. (2000). The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states: OUP Oxford.
• Jervis, R. (1998). System effects: Complexity in political and social life: Princeton University Press.
• Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R. O., & Krasner, S. D. (1998). International organization and the study of world politics. International Organization, 52(4), 645-685.
• Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R. O., & Krasner, S. D. (1999). Exploration and contestation in the study of world politics: MIT press.
• Kesselman, M., Krieger, J., & Joseph, W. A. (2018). Introduction to comparative politics: political challenges and changing agendas: Cengage Learning.
• Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2020). Public policy: A new introduction: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Knoke, D. (1990). Political networks: the structural perspective (Vol. 4): Cambridge University Press.
• Krieger, J., & Crahan, M. E. (2001). The Oxford companion to politics of the world: Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
• Krook, M. L., & True, J. (2012). Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality. European journal of international relations, 18(1), 103-127.
• Landman, T. (2005). Protecting human rights: A comparative study: Georgetown University Press.
• Lasswell, H. D. (2017). Power and society: A framework for political inquiry: Routledge.
• Lebow, R. N. (2008). A cultural theory of international relations: Cambridge University Press.
• Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. The aNNalS of the american academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 12-32.
• Lijphart, A. (1975). II. The comparable-cases strategy in comparative research. Comparative political studies, 8(2), 158-177.
• Lim, A., & Tsutsui, K. (2012). Globalization and commitment in corporate social responsibility: Cross-national analyses of institutional and political-economy effects. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 69-98.
• Lipschutz, R. D. (1992). Reconstructing world politics: the emergence of global civil society. Millennium, 21(3), 389-420.
• Magone, J. M. (2014). Routledge handbook of European politics: Routledge.
• McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research methods for political science: Quantitative and qualitative methods: Routledge.
• McNair, B. (2017). An introduction to political communication (Vol. 5): Taylor & Francis.
• Merry, S. E. (2011). Measuring the world: Indicators, human rights, and global governance. Current anthropology, 52(S3), S83-S95.
• Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on politics, 2(1), 55-73.
• Micheletti, M., & Stolle, D. (2004). Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present: transaction publishers.
• Michie, J. (2014). Reader’s guide to the social sciences: Routledge.
• Milner, H. V. (1998). Rationalizing politics: The emerging synthesis of international, American, and comparative politics. International Organization, 52(4), 759-786.
• Moran, M., Rein, M., & Goodin, R. E. (2008). The Oxford handbook of public policy: Oxford University Press.
• Mowlana, H. (1997). Global information and world communication: New frontiers in international relations. Global Information and World Communication, 1-288.
• Nash, K. (2009). Contemporary political sociology: Globalization, politics and power: John Wiley & Sons.
• Norris, P. (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government: OUP Oxford.
• Norris, P. (2004). Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behavior: Cambridge university press.
• Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited: Cambridge University Press.
• O’brien, R. (2000). Contesting global governance: Multilateral economic institutions and global social movements (Vol. 71): Cambridge University Press.
• Odugbemi, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Accountability through public opinion: from inertia to public action: World Bank Publications.
• Oppermann, K., & Viehrig, H. (2011). Issue salience in international politics (Vol. 91): Routledge.
• Pease, K.-K. S. (2018). International organizations: perspectives on global governance: Routledge.
• Peterson, V. S. (2004). A critical rewriting of global political economy: Integrating reproductive, productive and virtual economies: Routledge.
• Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World politics, 45(4), 595-628.
• Regilme Jr, S. S. F. (2022). Human dignity in international relations. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies.
• Rhodes, R. A. W., & Hart, P. t. (2014). The Oxford handbook of political leadership: Oxford Handbooks.
• Riaz, A., & Rahman, M. S. (2016). Routledge handbook of contemporary Bangladesh: Routledge.
• Ringen, S. (2017). The possibility of politics: A study in the political economy of the welfare state: Routledge.
• Runyan, A. S. (2018). Global gender issues in the new millennium: Routledge.
• Schudson, M. (2002). The news media as political institutions. Annual review of political science, 5(1), 249-269.
• Sending, O. J. (2015). The politics of expertise: Competing for authority in global governance: University of Michigan Press.
• Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781-810.
• Sing, M. (2009). Politics and government in Hong Kong: Crisis under Chinese sovereignty (Vol. 34): Taylor & Francis.
• Smith, J., Chatfield, C., & Pagnucco, R. (1998). Transnational social movements and global politics: Solidarity beyond the state: Syracuse University Press.
• Steiner, H. J., Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2008). International human rights in context: law, politics, morals: text and materials: Oxford University Press, USA.
• Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., & Micheletti, M. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International political science review, 26(3), 245-269.
• Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’of policy. Journal of European public policy, 11(3), 545-566.
• Swedlow, B. (2011). A cultural theory of politics: editor’s introduction: cultural theory’s contributions to political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 703-710.
• Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004). The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of international business studies, 35, 463-483.
• Telò, M. (2013). European Union and new regionalism: regional actors and global governance in a post-hegemonic era: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
• Thomas, G. W. (2012). Governance, good governance, and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. In Thinking about global governance (pp. 168-189): Routledge.
• Van de Graaf, T., Sovacool, B. K., Ghosh, A., Kern, F., & Klare, M. T. (2016). States, markets, and institutions: Integrating international political economy and global energy politics: Springer.
• Voltmer, K. (2004). Mass media and political communication in new democracies: Routledge.
• Walker, R. B. (1993). Inside/outside: international relations as political theory: Cambridge University Press.
• Young, I. M. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political theory, 29(5), 670-690.
• Zeng, K. (2019). Handbook on the international political economy of China: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Zoninsein, J. (1999). Global civil society and theories of international political economy. In The Revival of Civil Society: Global and Comparative Perspectives (pp. 38-60): Springer.

–

---

---

WEB – PAGE COUNTER