Abstract :
This research investigates the integration of technology in teacher education programs in Portugal, specifically examining its impact on teaching competencies and student engagement. It underscores the role of conceptual blending in science education, a technique that allows teachers to bridge the gap between abstract scientific models and practical learning experiences. By leveraging immersive learning environments, teachers can provide students with intuitive, hands-on experiences, making it easier for them to understand and retain complex concepts. The research highlights the importance of professional development programs centered on digital competency and blended learning, which are essential for preparing teachers to use technology effectively in various classroom contexts. Through such programs, teachers gain the skills needed to adopt technology-enhanced pedagogical strategies that promote active and engaging learning, particularly in science and mathematics. Moreover, the study analyzes the impact of conceptual blending within digital and augmented learning settings, revealing that immersive simulations facilitate deeper understanding by enabling experiential learning and fostering meaningful conceptual connections. The findings suggest that integrating technology into teacher education not only helps teachers adapt to evolving educational demands but also cultivates active, collaborative learning environments that pre-pare students for a digital future. Nonetheless, the study acknowledges challenges associated with digi-tal competency, such as unequal access to resources and the necessity for ongoing professional develop-ment to keep pace with rapid technological advancements. Addressing these challenges is essential for maximizing the benefits of technology in education and ensuring that all educators and students can fully participate in and benefit from digitally enhanced learning.

Keywords :
Blended Learning, Conceptual Blending, Digital Literacy, Immersive Learning, Professional Devel-opment, Science Education, Student Engagement, Teacher Education, Technology Integration.

–

References :

• Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3).
• Aidoo, B., Macdonald, M. A., Vesterinen, V. M., Pétursdóttir, S., & Gísladóttir, B. (2022). Transforming teaching with ICT using the flipped classroom approach: Dealing with COVID-19 pandemic. Education sciences, 12(6), 421.
• Akavova, A., Temirkhanova, Z., & Lorsanova, Z. (2023). Adaptive learning and artificial intelligence in the educational space. In E3S web of conferences (Vol. 451, p. 06011). EDP Sciences.
• Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 920317.
• Alajmi, M. K. (2022). The impact of digital leadership on teachers’ technology integration during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kuwait. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101928.
• Aldhafeeri, F. M., & Alotaibi, A. A. (2022). Effectiveness of digital education shifting model on high school students’ engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6869-6891.
• Al-Malah, D. K. A. R., Majeed, B. H., & ALRikabi, H. T. S. (2023). Enhancement the educational technology by using 5G networks. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 18(1), 137.
• Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., Yitmen, I., & Homod, R. Z. (2023). Enhancing student engagement: Harnessing “AIED”’s power in hybrid education—A review analysis. Education Sciences, 13(7), 632.
• Antonietti, C., Schmitz, M. L., Consoli, T., Cattaneo, A., Gonon, P., & Petko, D. (2023). Development and validation of the ICAP Technology Scale to measure how teachers integrate technology into learning activities. Computers & Education, 192, 104648.
• Antonietti, C., Schmitz, M. L., Consoli, T., Cattaneo, A., Gonon, P., & Petko, D. (2023). Development and validation of the ICAP Technology Scale to measure how teachers integrate technology into learning activities. Computers & Education, 192, 104648.
• Ardi, P., & Rianita, E. (2022). Leveraging gamification into EFL grammar class to boost student engagement. Teaching English with Technology, 22(2), 90-114.
• Asare, S., Hamidu, A., Aning, E., Ampomah, T., Bediako, Y. A., Amuaful, E., & Baah, K. B. (2023). The impact of integrating information technology in teaching english in college of education: A systematic review. American Journal of Education and Technology (AJET), 2(3), 76-82.
• Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: a systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 61.
• Banihashem, S. K., Farrokhnia, M., Badali, M., & Noroozi, O. (2022). The impacts of constructivist learning design and learning analytics on students’ engagement and self-regulation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(4), 442-452.
• Banitt, J., Theis, S., & Van Leeuwe, L. (2013). The effects of technology integration on student engagement.
• Barbour, D. R. (2014). The technology integration matrix and student engagement: A correlational study. Northcentral University.
• Baroudi, S., & Shaya, N. (2022). Exploring predictors of teachers’ self-efficacy for online teaching in the Arab world amid COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8093-8110.
• Bell, R. L., Maeng, J. L., & Binns, I. C. (2013). Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 348-379.
• Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., & Tamim, R. M. (2023). Gauging the effectiveness of educational technology integration in education: What the best-quality meta-analyses tell us. In Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 3929-3952). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Besser, E. D., Blackwell, L. E., & Saenz, M. (2022). Engaging students through educational podcasting: Three stories of implementation. Technology, knowledge and Learning, 27(3), 749-764.
• Bhat, R. A. (2023). The impact of technology integration on student learning outcomes: A comparative study. International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research and Technology (IJSET), 2(9), 592-596.
• Bice, H., & Tang, H. (2022). Teachers’ beliefs and practices of technology integration at a school for students with dyslexia: A mixed methods study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 10179-10205.
• Bigne, E., Badenes-Rocha, A., Ruiz, C., & Andreu, L. (2018). Virtual classroom: teacher skills to promote student engagement. Journal of Management and Business Education, 1(2), 87-105.
• Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1).
• Bond, M., & Bergdahl, N. (2022). Student engagement in open, distance, and digital education. In Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1-16). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
• Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Buntins, K., Kerres, M., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2020). Facilitating student engagement in higher education through educational technology: A narrative systematic review in the field of education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(2), 315-368.
• Bowman, M. A., Vongkulluksn, V. W., Jiang, Z., & Xie, K. (2022). Teachers’ exposure to professional development and the quality of their instructional technology use: The mediating role of teachers’ value and ability beliefs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 188-204.
• Bowman, M. A., Vongkulluksn, V. W., Jiang, Z., & Xie, K. (2022). Teachers’ exposure to professional development and the quality of their instructional technology use: The mediating role of teachers’ value and ability beliefs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 188-204.
• Brenner, A. M., & Brill, J. M. (2016). Investigating practices in teacher education that promote and inhibit technology integration transfer in early career teachers. TechTrends, 60, 136-144.
• Bui, T. H. (2022). English teachers’ integration of digital technologies in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100204.
• Burke, K., Fanshawe, M., & Tualaulelei, E. (2022). We can’t always measure what matters: Revealing opportunities to enhance online student engagement through pedagogical care. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(3), 287-300.
• Cakir, H. (2013). Use of blogs in pre-service teacher education to improve student engagement. Computers & Education, 68, 244-252.
• Cebi, A., Özdemir, T. B., Reisoğlu, İ., & Colak, C. (2022). From digital competences to technology integration: Re-formation of pre-service teachers’ knowledge and understanding. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 101965.
• Chen, Y. M. (2022). Understanding foreign language learners’ perceptions of teachers’ practice with educational technology with specific reference to Kahoot! and Padlet: A case from China. Education and information technologies, 27(2), 1439-1465.
• Cheng, P. H., Molina, J., Lin, M. C., Liu, H. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2022). A new TPACK training model for tackling the ongoing challenges of COVID-19. Applied System Innovation, 5(2), 32.
• Chien, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2022). A question, observation, and organisation‐based SVVR approach to enhancing students’ presentation performance, classroom engagement, and technology acceptance in a cultural course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 229-247.
• Chiu, T. K. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S14-S30.
• Chiu, T. K. (2022). School learning support for teacher technology integration from a self-determination theory perspective. Educational technology research and development, 70(3), 931-949.
• Chiu, T. K. (2023). Student engagement in K-12 online learning amid COVID-19: A qualitative approach from a self-determination theory perspective. Interactive learning environments, 31(6), 3326-3339.
• Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., Cowling, M. A., Vanderburg, R., & Vanderburg, M. A. (2023). Implementing educational technology in Higher Education Institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks and metrics. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16403-16429.
• D’Angelo, C. (2018). The impact of technology: Student engagement and success. Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2018.
• Dinc, E. (2019). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of barriers to technology integration in education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4), 381-398.
• Drljević, N., Botički, I., & Wong, L. H. (2022). Investigating the different facets of student engagement during augmented reality use in primary school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1361-1388.
• Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abdalla, M. E., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., & Al Kawas, S. (2022). Factors that affect student engagement in online learning in health professions education. Nurse Education Today, 110, 105261.
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & education, 59(2), 423-435.
• Eutsler, L. (2022). TPACK’s pedagogy and the gradual release of responsibility model coalesce: Integrating technology into literacy teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(3), 327-344.
• Fabian, K., Smith, S., Taylor‐Smith, E., & Meharg, D. (2022). Identifying factors influencing study skills engagement and participation for online learners in higher education during COVID‐19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1915-1936.
• Fidan, M. (2023). The effects of microlearning-supported flipped classroom on pre-service teachers’ learning performance, motivation and engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12687-12714.
• Gamage, K. A., Gamage, A., & Dehideniya, S. C. (2022). Online and hybrid teaching and learning: Enhance effective student engagement and experience. Education Sciences, 12(10), 651.
• Gomez Jr, F. C., Trespalacios, J., Hsu, Y. C., & Yang, D. (2022). Exploring teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy through the 2017 ISTE Standards. TechTrends, 66(2), 159-171.
• Gopinathan, S., Kaur, A. H., Veeraya, S., & Raman, M. (2022). The role of digital collaboration in student engagement towards enhancing student participation during COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(11), 6844.
• Han, Z., Tu, Y., & Huang, C. (2023). A framework for constructing a technology-enhanced education metaverse: Learner engagement with human–machine collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(6), 1179-1189.
• Hanaysha, J. R., Shriedeh, F. B., & In’airat, M. (2023). Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 100188.
• Hazzam, J., & Wilkins, S. (2023). The influences of lecturer charismatic leadership and technology use on student online engagement, learning performance, and satisfaction. Computers & Education, 200, 104809.
• Hodges, C. B., Barbour, M., & Ferdig, R. E. (2022). A 2025 vision for building access to K-12 online and blended learning in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 30(2), 201-216.
• Huang, Y. M., Silitonga, L. M., Murti, A. T., & Wu, T. T. (2023). Learner engagement in a business simulation game: Impact on higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(1), 96-126.
• Indra, M. H., Sutarto, S., Kharizmi, M., Nurmiati, A. S., & Susanto, A. (2023). Optimizing the Potential of Technology-Based Learning Increases Student Engagement. Al-Fikrah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(2), 233-244.
• Jin, Y., Clausen, J. M., Elkordy, A., Greene, K., & McVey, M. (2023). Design principles for modeled experiences in technology-infused teacher preparation programs. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 151-198.
• Kabilan, M. K., Annamalai, N., & Chuah, K. M. (2023). Practices, purposes and challenges in integrating gamification using technology: A mixed-methods study on university academics. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14249-14281.
• Kala, D., & Chaubey, D. S. (2023). Examination of relationships among technology acceptance, student engagement, and perceived learning on tourism-related MOOCs. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 23(1), 39-56.
• Kang, X., & Zhang, W. (2023). An experimental case study on forum-based online teaching to improve student’s engagement and motivation in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1029-1040.
• Karchmer-Klein, R., & Konishi, H. (2023). A mixed-methods study of novice teachers’ technology integration: Do they leverage their TPACK knowledge once entering the profession?. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(3), 490-506.
• Kareem, J., Thomas, R. S., & Nandini, V. S. (2022). A conceptual model of teaching efficacy and beliefs, teaching outcome expectancy, student technology use, student engagement, and 21st-century learning attitudes: A STEM education study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2282.
• Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., … & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274.
• Khan, R. A., Atta, K., Sajjad, M., & Jawaid, M. (2022). Twelve tips to enhance student engagement in synchronous online teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, 44(6), 601-606.
• Khukalenko, I. S., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., An, Y., & Iushina, V. D. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of using virtual reality technology in classrooms: A large-scale survey. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11591-11613.
• King, L. G., McKim, A. J., Raven, M. R., & Pauley, C. M. (2019). New and emerging technologies: Teacher needs, adoption, methods, and student engagement. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(3), 277-290.
• Koç, M. (2005). Implications of learning theories for effective technology integration and pre-service teacher training: A critical literature review. Journal of Turkish science education, 2(1), 2-18.
• Kowitlawakul, Y., Tan, J. J. M., Suebnukarn, S., Nguyen, H. D., Poo, D. C. C., Chai, J., … & Devi, K. (2022). Utilizing educational technology in enhancing undergraduate nursing students’ engagement and motivation: A scoping review. Journal of professional nursing, 42, 262-275.
• Kucuk, T. (2023). Technology integrated teaching and its positive and negative impacts on education. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(1), 46-55.
• Kurt, G., Atay, D., & Öztürk, H. A. (2022). Student engagement in K12 online education during the pandemic: The case of Turkey. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S31-S47.
• Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 56.
• Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Huang, X. (2022). The differential interplay of TPACK, teacher beliefs, school culture and professional development with the nature of in‐service EFL teachers’ technology adoption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1389-1411.
• Lee, Y. J., Davis, R., & Li, Y. (2022). Implementing Synchronous Online Flipped Learning for Pre-Service Teachers during COVID-19. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 653-661.
• Li, Z., & Li, J. (2022). Using the flipped classroom to promote learner engagement for the sustainable development of language skills: A mixed-methods study. Sustainability, 14(10), 5983.
• Limniou, M., Sedghi, N., Kumari, D., & Drousiotis, E. (2022). Student engagement, learning environments and the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison between psychology and engineering undergraduate students in the UK. Education Sciences, 12(10), 671.
• Lu, G., Xie, K., & Liu, Q. (2022). What influences student situational engagement in smart classrooms: Perception of the learning environment and students’ motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1665-1687.
• Mama, M., & Hennessy, S. (2010). Level of technology integration by primary teachers in Cyprus and student engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 269-275.
• Martin, F., & Borup, J. (2022). Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 162-177.
• McClure, J., & Pilgrim, J. (2022). Implementing a 1: 1 technology program in a rural, public school: A study of perceptions of technology integration. Journal of research on technology in education, 54(2), 302-316.
• Meirovitz, T., Russak, S., & Zur, A. (2022). English as a foreign language teachers’ perceptions regarding their pedagogical-technological knowledge and its implementation in distance learning during COVID-19. Heliyon, 8(4).
• Meyliana, Sablan, B., Surjandy, & Hidayanto, A. N. (2022). Flipped learning effect on classroom engagement and outcomes in university information systems class. Education and Information Technologies, 1-19.
• Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational technology research and development, 71(1), 137-161.
• Ngao, A. I., Sang, G., & Kihwele, J. E. (2022). Understanding teacher educators’ perceptions and practices about ICT integration in teacher education program. Education Sciences, 12(8), 549.
• O’Connor, J., Ludgate, S., Le, Q. V., Le, H. T., & Huynh, P. D. P. (2023). Lessons from the pandemic: Teacher educators’ use of digital technologies and pedagogies in Vietnam before, during and after the Covid-19 lockdown. International Journal of Educational Development, 103, 102942.
• Rafiq, A. A., Triyono, M. B., & Djatmiko, I. W. (2023). The integration of inquiry and problem-based learning and its impact on increasing the vocational student involvement. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 659-684.
• Rakes, C. R., Stites, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Bush, S. B., Fisher, M. H., Safi, F., … & Viera, J. (2022). Teaching mathematics with technology: TPACK and effective teaching practices. Education Sciences, 12(2), 133.
• Ramaila, S., & Molwele, A. J. (2022). The Role of Technology Integration in the Development of 21st Century Skills and Competencies in Life Sciences Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(5), 9-17.
• Ramaila, S., & Molwele, A. J. (2022). The Role of Technology Integration in the Development of 21st Century Skills and Competencies in Life Sciences Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(5), 9-17.
• Rintaningrum, R. (2023). Technology integration in English language teaching and learning: Benefits and challenges. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2164690.
• Rofi’i, A., Nurhidayat, E., & Firharmawan, H. (2023). Teachers’ Professional Competence in Integrating Technology: A Case Study at English Teacher Forum in Majalengka. IJLECR (International Journal of Language Education and Cultural Review), 9(1), 64-73.
• Roman, T. A., Brantley-Dias, L., Dias, M., & Edwards, B. (2022). Addressing student engagement during COVID-19: Secondary STEM teachers attend to the affective dimension of learner needs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S65-S93.
• Rowston, K., Bower, M., & Woodcock, S. (2022). The impact of prior occupations and initial teacher education on post-graduate pre-service teachers’ conceptualization and realization of technology integration. International journal of technology and design education, 32(5), 2631-2669.
• Ruggiero, D., & Mong, C. J. (2015). The teacher technology integration experience: Practice and reflection in the classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14.
• Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., & Hu, X. (2022). Artificial intelligence and learning analytics in teacher education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 12(8), 569.
• Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. British journal of educational technology, 53(3), 593-619.
• Salhab, R., & Daher, W. (2023). University students’ engagement in mobile learning. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(1), 202-216.
• Schmitz, M. L., Antonietti, C., Consoli, T., Cattaneo, A., Gonon, P., & Petko, D. (2023). Transformational leadership for technology integration in schools: Empowering teachers to use technology in a more demanding way. Computers & Education, 204, 104880.
• Serrano, D. R., Dea‐Ayuela, M. A., Gonzalez‐Burgos, E., Serrano‐Gil, A., & Lalatsa, A. (2019). Technology‐enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 273-286.
• Suarta, I. M., Noortyani, R., Yarsama, K., & Adhiti, I. A. I. (2022). The role of Teachers’ indigenous knowledge and cultural competencies in enhancing students’ engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 9(1), 244-264.
• Sum, M., & Oancea, A. (2022). The use of technology in higher education teaching by academics during the COVID-19 emergency remote teaching period: a systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 59.
• Tambak, S., & Sukenti, D. (2023). Student involvement within islamic teacher education: for a future profession. Qijis (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies., 11(2), 317-352.
• Tomé, A., & Coelho, J. L. (2023). Physiotherapy Education in the Digital Era: A Roadmap of Educational Technologies for Allied Health Educators. In Handbook of Research on Instructional Technologies in Health Education and Allied Disciplines (pp. 26-54). IGI Global.
• Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1189-1209.
• Trust, T., Maloy, R. W., & Edwards, S. (2023). College student engagement in OER design projects: Impacts on attitudes, motivation, and learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 353-371.
• Vats, S., & Joshi, R. (2023, December). The impact of virtual reality in education: A comprehensive research study. In International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT (pp. 126-136). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
• Veluvali, P., & Surisetti, J. (2022). Learning management system for greater learner engagement in higher education—A review. Higher Education for the Future, 9(1), 107-121.
• Wallace, J., Scanlon, D., & Calderón, A. (2023). Digital technology and teacher digital competency in physical education: a holistic view of teacher and student perspectives. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 14(3), 271-287.
• Wang, C., Mirzaei, T., Xu, T., & Lin, H. (2022). How learner engagement impacts non-formal online learning outcomes through value co-creation: An empirical analysis. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 19(1), 32.
• Wang, J., Tigelaar, D. E., Luo, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Teacher beliefs, classroom process quality, and student engagement in the smart classroom learning environment: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 183, 104501.
• Wei, Y. (2022). Toward technology-based education and English as a foreign language motivation: A review of literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 870540.
• Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2022). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 1-17.
• Werang, B. R., & Leba, S. M. R. (2022). Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Online Teaching and Learning: A Qualitative Case Study. Qualitative Report, 27(2).
• Wilkin, C. L., Rubino, C., Zell, D., & Shelton, L. M. (2013). Where technologies collide: A technology integration model. In Increasing student engagement and retention using classroom technologies: Classroom response systems and mediated discourse technologies (pp. 81-106). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Wu, L., Hsieh, P. J., & Wu, S. M. (2022). Developing effective e-learning environments through e-learning use mediating technology affordance and constructivist learning aspects for performance impacts: Moderator of learner involvement. The Internet and Higher Education, 55, 100871.
• Yang, D., Wang, H., Metwally, A. H. S., & Huang, R. (2023). Student engagement during emergency remote teaching: A scoping review. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 24.
• Yılmaz, A. (2021). The effect of technology integration in education on prospective teachers’ critical and creative thinking, multidimensional 21st century skills and academic achievements. Participatory Educational Research, 8(2), 163-199.
• Yu, Z., Yu, L., Xu, Q., Xu, W., & Wu, P. (2022). Effects of mobile learning technologies and social media tools on student engagement and learning outcomes of English learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(3), 381-398.
• Yurtseven Avci, Z., O’Dwyer, L. M., & Lawson, J. (2020). Designing effective professional development for technology integration in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 160-177.
• Zalavra, E., & Makri, K. (2022). Relocating online a technology-enhanced microteaching practice in teacher education: Challenges and implications. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(3), 270-283.
• Zen, Z., & Ariani, F. (2022). Academic achievement: the effect of project-based online learning method and student engagement. Heliyon, 8(11).
• Zeng, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, S. (2022). The relationship between teachers’ information technology integration self-efficacy and TPACK: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1091017.
• Zhang, W. (2022). The role of technology-based education and teacher professional development in English as a foreign language classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 910315.
• Zhang, Y. (2022). The effect of educational technology on EFL learners’ self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 881301.
• Zourmpakis, A. I., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Education of preschool and elementary teachers on the use of adaptive gamification in science education. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1-16.

–

---

---

WEB – PAGE COUNTER