Abstract :
This paper explores how the convergence of populism, polarization, social media, and identity politics is reshaping the political landscape in the United States, posing significant challenges to democratic stability and cohesion. It argues that severe political polarization undermines the foundations of democracy by transforming opposition into entrenched, antagonistic identities, creating an “us versus them” environment where compromise becomes nearly impossible. Populist leaders exploit these divisions by framing political conflict as a battle between “the people” and a morally corrupt elite, capitalizing on citizen disillusionment and intensifying the divide. This narrative further aligns citizens with fixed identity-based factions, shifting loyalty away from democratic principles toward factional allegiance. As polarization deepens, individuals increasingly view opposing viewpoints as existential threats, creating a feedback loop where democratic norms are abandoned in favor of partisan loyalty. Social media amplifies these dynamics, enabling populists to communicate directly with audiences, bypassing traditional media’s gatekeeping role. The direct and often unfiltered nature of social media encourages emotionally charged, polarizing messages that foster loyalty among followers by stoking resentment and amplifying biases. The digital environment thus reinforces ideological silos, creating echo chambers where citizens encounter only content that aligns with their preexisting beliefs. This fragmentation of public discourse weakens the capacity for fact-based debate and fuels the spread of misinformation, which further erodes trust in democratic institutions. The study also examines how identity politics strengthens polarization, as individuals increasingly align with groups that reflect cultural, economic, or ideological distinctions rather than nuanced policy positions. This ‘tribal’ behavior fosters an environment in which adversaries are not merely political opponents but are perceived as threats to one’s way of life, deepening the divide. In response, this paper calls for approaches that promote social cohesion, emphasize shared democratic values, and resist the forces driving extreme polarization and populist appeal.

Keywords :
Authoritarianism, Democracy, Echo Chambers, Identity Politics, Misinformation, Polarization, Populism, Social Media, Tribalism, USA.

–

References :

• Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 644(1), 20-39.
• Bornschier, S., Häusermann, S., Zollinger, D., & Colombo, C. (2021). How “us” and “them” relates to voting behavior—social structure, social identities, and electoral choice. Comparative Political Studies, 54(12), 2087-2122.
• Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K., & Bimber, B. (2020). Right-wing populism, social media and echo chambers in Western democracies. New media & society, 22(4), 683-699.
• Fukuyama, F. (2018). Against identity politics: The new tribalism and the crisis of democracy. Foreign Aff., 97, 90.
• Groshek, J., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2017). Helping populism win? Social media use, filter bubbles, and support for populist presidential candidates in the 2016 US election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1389-1407.
• Grover, P., Kar, A. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Janssen, M. (2019). Polarization and acculturation in US Election 2016 outcomes–Can twitter analytics predict changes in voting preferences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 438-460.
• Kubin, E., & Von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188-206.
• Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Panayiotou, O., Castellanos, K., & Batayneh, J. (2018). Populism as identity politics: Perceived in-group disadvantage, collective narcissism, and support for populism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 151-162.
• McCall, L., & Orloff, A. S. (2017). The multidimensional politics of inequality: Taking stock of identity politics in the US Presidential election of 2016. The British Journal of Sociology, 68, S34-S56.
• McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16-42.
• Meléndez, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2019). Political identities: The missing link in the study of populism. Party Politics, 25(4), 520-533.
• Monroig, R. (2018). Social Networks, Political Discourse and Polarization during the 2017 Catalan elections (Master’s thesis, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)).
• Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative political studies, 51(13), 1667-1693.
• Noury, A., & Roland, G. (2020). Identity politics and populism in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 421-439.
• Oberhauser, A. M., Krier, D., & Kusow, A. M. (2019). Political moderation and polarization in the heartland: Economics, rurality, and social identity in the 2016 US presidential election. The Sociological Quarterly, 60(2), 224-244.
• Prinz, J. (2021). Emotion and political polarization. The politics of emotional shockwaves, 1-25.
• Roberts, K. M. (2022). Populism and polarization in comparative perspective: Constitutive, spatial and institutional dimensions. Government and Opposition, 57(4), 680-702.
• Sarsfield, R., Nina Wiesehomeier, K. A., Hawkins, E. H., Chryssogelos, A., & Littvay, L. (2024). Populist rhetoric and affective polarization. The Ideational Approach to Populism, Volume II: Consequences and Mitigation, 97.
• Schumann, S., Boer, D., Hanke, K., & Liu, J. (2021). Social media use and support for populist radical right parties: assessing exposure and selection effects in a two-wave panel study. Information, communication & society, 24(7), 921-940.
• Stroschein, S. (2019). Populism, nationalism, and party politics. Nationalities Papers, 47(6), 923-935.
• Vecchi, A., Silva, E. S., & Jimenez Angel, L. M. (2021). Nation branding, cultural identity and political polarization–an exploratory framework. International Marketing Review, 38(1), 70-98.
• Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Perceiving political polarization in the United States: Party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspectives on psychological science, 10(2), 145-158.

–

---

---

WEB – PAGE COUNTER