Abstract :
This research paper delves into the intricate realm of the economic analysis of law, traversing its historical evolution, foundational principles, key figures, global impact, and responses to criticisms. Originating from the musings of classical economists such as Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Frédéric Bastiat in the 18th century, the economic analysis of law gained formalization in the mid-20th century, primarily through the influential work of scholars from the Chicago school of economics. The pivotal role of figures like Aaron Director, George Stigler, and Ronald Coase shaped the field, leading to institutionalization, the establishment of The Journal of Law & Economics, and seminal works like Coase’s “The Problem of Social Cost.” The methodological foundations of the economic analysis of law, exemplified by Richard Posner’s approach to criminal methodology, undergo scrutiny, with methodological critiques prompting dynamic responses. Adaptations include the integration of game theory, behavioral economics, and empirical methods, expanding the analytical toolkit of the field. This research explores the normative and positive dimensions of law and economics, unraveling its dual role in predicting the effects of legal rules and making policy recommendations based on economic consequences. Efficiency, particularly Pareto efficiency, emerges as a guiding principle, influencing policy formulations and legal doctrines. Global examples showcase the adaptability of law and economics to diverse legal traditions, from the United States to Germany, India, and Africa. Criticisms, both external and internal, are scrutinized, revealing challenges to neoclassical assumptions and methodological frameworks. The theory of the second best questions unambiguous outcomes, while “internal” analytical criticisms emphasize the need for flexible models that gracefully degrade to reflect real-world complexities. In conclusion, this research paper provides a holistic understanding of the economic analysis of law, emphasizing its dynamic nature, adaptability, and influence across legal traditions.

Keywords :
Behavioural Economics, Chicago School of Economics, Economic Efficiency in Law, Legal Institutions, Eco-Legal Theory, Normative Law and Economics, Positive Law and Economics.

–

References :

• Acquisti, A., Taylor, C., & Wagman, L. (2016). The economics of privacy. Journal of economic literature, 54(2), 442-492.
• Aidt, T. S. (2003). Economic analysis of corruption: a survey. The Economic Journal, 113(491), F632-F652.
• Akerlof, G. A., & Dickens, W. T. (1982). The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. The American economic review, 72(3), 307-319.
• Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes Ii, K. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, organizations and society, 29(5-6), 447- 471.
• Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of financial economics, 77(1), 57-116.
• Angus, M. (1998). Development Centre studies Chinese economic performance in the long run: OECD publishing.
• Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis: MIT press.
• Areeda, P., & Turner, D. F. (1975). Predatory pricing and related practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. J. Reprints Antitrust L. & Econ., 6, 219.
• Armstrong, M., Cowan, S., & Vickers, J. (1994). Regulatory reform: economic analysis and British experience (Vol. 20): MIT press.
• Arrow, K. J. (1974). Limited knowledge and economic analysis. American economic review, 64(1).
• Arrow, K. J. (1978). Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. In Uncertainty in economics (pp. 345-375): Elsevier.
• Arrow, K. J. (1984). The economics of agency.
• Arruñada, B. (1996). The economics of notaries. European Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 5-37.
• Avraham, R. (2012). The Economics of Insurance Law-A Primer. Conn. Ins. LJ, 19, 29.
• Ayres, I., & Gertner, R. (1989). Filling gaps in incomplete contracts: An economic theory of default rules. Yale LJ, 99, 87.
• Ball, R. (2001). Infrastructure requirements for an economically efficient system of public financial reporting and disclosure. Brookings-Wharton papers on financial services, 2001(1), 127-169.
• Banerjee, A., & Iyer, L. (2005). History, institutions, and economic performance: The legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India. American economic review, 95(4), 1190-1213.
• Barton, B. H. (2001). Why do we regulate lawyers: An economic analysis of the justifications for entry and conduct regulation. Ariz. St. LJ, 33, 429.
• Barzel, Y. (1982). Measurement cost and the organization of markets. The journal of law and Economics, 25(1), 27-48.
• Barzel, Y. (1997). Economic analysis of property rights: Cambridge university press.
• Baumol, W. J. (2014). The free-market innovation machine: Analyzing the growth miracle of capitalism. In The free-market innovation machine: Princeton university press.
• Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior (Vol. 803): University of Chicago press.
• Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of political Economy, 101(3), 385-409.
• Becker, G. S. (2013). The economic approach to human behavior: University of Chicago press.
• Becker, G. S., Landes, E. M., & Michael, R. T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. Journal of political Economy, 85(6), 1141-1187.
• Becker, G. S., & Stigler, G. J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), 1-18.
• Bessen, J., & Meurer, M. J. (2009). Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put innovators at risk: Princeton University Press.
• Blair, M. M., & Stout, L. A. (2017). A team production theory of corporate law. In Corporate governance (pp. 169-250): Gower.
• Boardman, A. E., & Vining, A. R. (1989). Ownership and performance in competitive environments: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and state-owned enterprises. The journal of law and Economics, 32(1), 1-33.
• Boari, N., & Fiorentini, G. (2001). An economic analysis of plea bargaining: the incentives of the parties in a mixed penal system. International Review of Law and Economics, 21(2), 213-231.
• Brown, J. P. (1973). Toward an economic theory of liability. The Journal of Legal Studies, 2(2), 323-349.
• Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and Leviathan: University of Chicago Press.
• Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2012). The economy of brain network organization. Nature reviews neuroscience, 13(5), 336-349.
• Cain, G. G. (1986). The economic analysis of labor market discrimination: A survey. Handbook of labor economics, 1, 693-785.
• Calabresi, G. (2008). The cost of accidents: a legal and economic analysis: Yale University Press.
• Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for” asymmetric paternalism”. University of Pennsylvania law review, 151(3), 1211-1254.
• Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. Advances in behavioral economics, 1, 3-51.
• Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (2004). Advances in behavioral economics: Princeton university press.
• Caves, R. E. (1996). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis: Cambridge university press.
• Chou, S.-Y., Grossman, M., & Saffer, H. (2017). An economic analysis of adult obesity: results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. In Determinants of Health: An Economic Perspective (pp. 666-693): Columbia University Press.
• Coase, R. H. (1974). The lighthouse in economics. The journal of law and Economics, 17(2), 357-376.
• Coase, R. H. (2012). The firm, the market, and the law: University of Chicago press.
• Coase, R. H. (2013). The problem of social cost. The journal of law and Economics, 56(4), 837-877.
• Coffee Jr, J. C. (1984). Market failure and the economic case for a mandatory disclosure system. Virginia Law Review, 717-753.
• Coffee Jr, J. C. (1986). Understanding the plaintiff’s attorney: The implications of economic theory for private enforcement of law through class and derivative actions. Colum. L. Rev., 86, 669.
• Cohen, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Judicial choice and disparities between measures of economic values. Osgoode Hall LJ, 30, 737.
• Coleman, J. L. (1992). Risks and wrongs: CUP Archive.
• Collier, P., & Gunning, J. W. (1999). Explaining African economic performance. Journal of economic literature, 37(1), 64-111.
• Commons, J. R. (2017). Legal foundations of capitalism: Routledge.
• Cooter, R., & Ulen, T. (2011). Law and economics: Addison-Wesley.
• Cooter, R. D., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1989). Economic analysis of legal disputes and their resolution. Journal of economic literature, 27(3), 1067-1097.
• Dahlman, C. J. (1979). The problem of externality. The journal of law and Economics, 22(1), 141-162.
• Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. The journal of law and Economics, 16(1), 67-88.
• Demsetz, H. (1983). The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 375-390.
• Dixit, A. K. (2004). Lawlessness and economics: Alternative modes of governance (Vol. 5): Princeton University Press.
• Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). The new comparative economics. Journal of comparative economics, 31(4), 595-619.
• Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of financial economics, 88(3), 430-465.
• Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Shleifer, A. (2007). Private credit in 129 countries. Journal of financial economics, 84(2), 299-329.
• Dorfman, R., Samuelson, P. A., & Solow, R. M. (1987). Linear programming and economic analysis: Courier Corporation.
• Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Foreword: the court and the economic system. Harv. L. Rev., 98, 4.
• Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1983). Voting in corporate law. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 395-427.
• Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1985). Limited liability and the corporation. U. Chi. L. Rev., 52, 89.
• Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1996). The economic structure of corporate law: Harvard university press.
• Economides, N., Hubbard, R. G., & Palia, D. (1996). The political economy of branching restrictions and deposit insurance: A model of monopolistic competition among small and large banks. The journal of law and Economics, 39(2), 667-704.
• Edwards, H. T. (1992). The growing disjunction between legal education and the legal profession. Michigan Law Review, 91(1), 34-78.
• Eggertsson, Þ. (1990). Economic behavior and institutions: Principles of Neoinstitutional Economics: Cambridge University Press.
• Ehrenberg, R., Smith, R., & Hallock, K. (2021). Modern labor economics: Theory and public policy: Routledge.
• Ehrlich, I. (1973). Participation in illegitimate activities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of political Economy, 81(3), 521-565.
• Ehrlich, I., & Posner, R. A. (1974). An economic analysis of legal rulemaking. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), 257-286.
• Ekelund Jr, R. B., & Hébert, R. F. (2013). A history of economic theory and method: Waveland Press.
• El-Gamal, M. A. (2006). Islamic finance: Law, economics, and practice: Cambridge University Press.
• Ellickson, R. C. (1991). Order without law: How neighbors settle disputes: Harvard University Press.
• Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349.
• Farber, D. A., & Frickey, P. P. (1991). Law and public choice: a critical introduction: University of Chicago Press.
• Fligstein, N. (2018). The architecture of markets: An economic sociology of twenty-first-century capitalist societies.
• Gabaix, X. (2009). Power laws in economics and finance. Annu. Rev. Econ., 1(1), 255-294.
• Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of cleaner production, 114, 11-32.
• Goldberg, V. P. (1976). Regulation and administered contracts. the Bell journal of economics, 426-448.
• Gómez-Baggethun, E., De Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological economics, 69(6), 1209-1218.
• Gordon, J. N., & Roe, M. J. (2004). Convergence and persistence in corporate governance: Cambridge University Press.
• Gordon, W. J. (1982). Fair use as market failure: A structural and economic analysis of the Betamax case and its predecessors. J. Copyright Soc’y USA, 30, 253.
• Grady, M. F. (1983). A new positive economic theory of negligence. The Yale Law Journal, 92(5), 799-829.
• Granovetter, M. (2018a). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. In The sociology of economic life (pp. 22-45): Routledge.
• Granovetter, M. (2018b). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. In The sociology of economic life (pp. 46-61): Routledge.
• Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade: Cambridge University Press.
• Gwartney, J. (2008). Economic freedom of the world: 2008 annual report: The Fraser Institute.
• Hausman, D., McPherson, M., & Satz, D. (2016). Economic analysis, moral philosophy, and public policy: Cambridge University Press.
• Hodgson, G. M. (1998). The approach of institutional economics. Journal of economic literature, 36(1), 166-192.
• Hursh, S. R. (2000). Behavioral economic concepts and methods for studying health behavior. Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics, 27-60.
• Ippolito, R. A. (1992). Consumer reaction to measures of poor quality: Evidence from the mutual fund industry. The journal of law and Economics, 35(1), 45-70.
• Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. (1997). A behavioral approach to law and economics. StAn. l. reV., 50, 1471.
• Kahn, A. E. (1988). The economics of regulation: principles and institutions (Vol. 1): MIT press.
• Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American economic review, 93(5), 1449-1475.
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of business, S285-S300.
• Kaplow, L. (2013). Rules versus standards: An economic analysis. In Scientific Models of Legal Reasoning (pp. 11-84): Routledge.
• Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour: Cambridge University Press.
• Kitch, E. W. (1977). The nature and function of the patent system. The journal of law and Economics, 20(2), 265-290.
• Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure. The journal of law and Economics, 41(1), 275-304.
• Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. The journal of law and Economics, 21(2), 297-326.
• Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: cross‐country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics & politics, 7(3), 207-227.
• Komesar, N. K. (1994). Imperfect alternatives: choosing institutions in law, economics, and public policy: University of Chicago Press.
• Korobkin, R. B., & Ulen, T. S. (2000). Law and behavioral science: Removing the rationality assumption from law and economics. Calif. L. Rev., 88, 1051.
• Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Ringe, W.-G. (2017). The anatomy of corporate law: A comparative and functional approach: Oxford university press.
• Lande, R. H. (2017). Wealth transfers as the original and primary concern of antitrust: The efficiency interpretation challenged. In Competition Law (pp. 45-129): Routledge.
• Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (1975). The independent judiciary in an interest-group perspective. The journal of law and Economics, 18(3), 875-901.
• Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (1987). Trademark law: an economic perspective. The journal of law and Economics, 30(2), 265- 309.
• Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (1989). An economic analysis of copyright law. The Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), 325-363.
• Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (2003). The economic structure of intellectual property law: Harvard university press.
• Levine, R. (1998). The legal environment, banks, and long-run economic growth. Journal of money, credit and banking, 596-613.
• Levine, R. (1999). Law, finance, and economic growth. Journal of financial Intermediation, 8(1-2), 8-35.
• Levine, R. (2002). Bank-based or market-based financial systems: which is better? Journal of financial Intermediation, 11(4), 398- 428.
• Li, H., & Zhou, L.-A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of public economics, 89(9-10), 1743-1762.
• Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of cleaner production, 115, 36-51.
• Lo, A. W. (2004). The adaptive markets hypothesis: Market efficiency from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Portfolio Management, Forthcoming.
• Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a social system: Oxford socio-legal studies.
• Macaulay, S. (2018). Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. In The Sociology of Economic Life (pp. 198-212): Routledge.
• Majone, G. (2019). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. In The State in Western Europe (pp. 77-101): Routledge.
• Marshall, A. (2009). Principles of economics: unabridged eighth edition: Cosimo, Inc.
• McConnell, C. R., Brue, S. L., & Flynn, S. M. (2018). Microeconomics: principles, problems, and policies: McGraw-Hill.
• Nelson, R. R., & Sampat, B. N. (2001). Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 44(1), 31-54.
• Nickell, S., & Layard, R. (1999). Labor market institutions and economic performance. Handbook of labor economics, 3, 3029- 3084.
• Niskanen, W. A. (1975). Bureaucrats and politicians. The journal of law and Economics, 18(3), 617-643.
• North, D. C. (1989). Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. World development, 17(9), 1319-1332.
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance: Cambridge university press.
• North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American economic review, 84(3), 359-368.
• Ogus, A. I. (2004). Regulation: Legal form and economic theory: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Okun, A. M. (2015). Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff: Brookings Institution Press.
• Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815-1831.
• Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1989). Economics of natural resources and the environment: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. The journal of law and Economics, 19(2), 211-240.
• Phelps, C. E. (2017). Health economics: Routledge.
• Polinsky, A. M., & Shavell, S. (1997). Punitive damages: An economic analysis. Harv. L. Rev., 111, 869.
• Polinsky, A. M., & Shavell, S. (2000). The economic theory of public enforcement of law. Journal of economic literature, 38(1), 45- 76.
• Pollak, R. A. (1985). A transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of economic literature, 23(2), 581-608.
• Posner, R. A. (1973). An economic approach to legal procedure and judicial administration. The Journal of Legal Studies, 2(2), 399-458.
• Posner, R. A. (1974). Theories of economic regulation (0898-2937). Retrieved from
• Posner, R. A. (1979). Utilitarianism, economics, and legal theory. The Journal of Legal Studies, 8(1), 103-140.
• Posner, R. A. (1983). The economics of justice: Harvard University Press.
• Posner, R. A. (1985). An economic theory of the criminal law. Colum. L. Rev., 85, 1193.
• Posner, R. A. (1993). What do judges and justices maximize?(The same thing everybody else does). Supreme Court Economic Review, 3, 1-41.
• Posner, R. A. (1995). Overcoming law: Harvard University Press.
• Posner, R. A. (2000). An economic analysis of the use of citations in the law. American Law and Economics Review, 2(2), 381-406.
• Posner, R. A. (2009). Antitrust law: University of Chicago press.
• Posner, R. A. (2013). The decline of law as an autonomous discipline: 1962–1987. In Scientific Models of Legal Reasoning (pp. 203-222): Routledge.
• Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic analysis of law: Aspen Publishing.
• Priest, G. L. (1977). The common law process and the selection of efficient rules. The Journal of Legal Studies, 6(1), 65-82.
• Rachlinski, J. J. (2011). The psychological foundations of behavioral law and economics. U. Ill. L. Rev., 1675.
• Radin, M. J. (2013). Market-inalienability. In Contract-Freedom and Restraint (pp. 269-357): Routledge.
• Ravenscraft, D. J., & Scherer, F. M. (2011). Mergers, sell-offs, and economic efficiency: Brookings Institution Press.
• Rodrik, D. (2005). Growth strategies. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 967-1014.
• Rose-Ackerman, S. (2013). Corruption: A study in political economy: Academic press.
• Rubin, P. H. (1977). Why is the common law efficient? The Journal of Legal Studies, 6(1), 51-63.
• Rubin, P. H. (2014). The Theory of the Firm and the Structure of the Franchise Contract. In Franchising (pp. 49-59): Routledge.
• Ryo, E. (2013). Deciding to cross: norms and economics of unauthorized migration. American Sociological Review, 78(4), 574- 603.
• Sagoff, M. (2007). The economy of the earth: philosophy, law, and the environment: Cambridge University Press.
• Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research policy, 30(3), 509-532.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (2006). History of economic analysis: Routledge.
• Sebesta, S. (2018). Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy, Volume 1: Routledge.
• Shavell, S. (1982). Suit, settlement, and trial: A theoretical analysis under alternative methods for the allocation of legal costs. The Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 55-81.
• Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason (Vol. 3): MIT press.
• Slemrod, J. (2007). Cheating ourselves: The economics of tax evasion. Journal of Economic perspectives, 21(1), 25-48.
• Smelser, N. J., & Baltes, P. B. (2001). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 11): Elsevier Amsterdam.
• Stewart, R. B. (1974). The reformation of American administrative law. Harv. L. Rev., 88, 1667.
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics. American economic review, 92(3), 460-501.
• Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. In: The Commission Paris.
• Sunstein, C. R. (1999a). Free markets and social justice: Oxford University Press.
• Sunstein, C. R. (1999b). The law of group polarization. University of Chicago Law School, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper(91).
• Swedberg, R. (2009). Principles of economic sociology: Princeton University Press.
• Swedberg, R. (2018). Max Weber and the idea of economic sociology: Princeton University Press.
• Tengs, T. O., Adams, M. E., Pliskin, J. S., Safran, D. G., Siegel, J. E., Weinstein, M. C., & Graham, J. D. (1995). Five‐hundred life‐saving interventions and their cost‐effectiveness. Risk analysis, 15(3), 369-390.
• Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save more tomorrow™: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of political Economy, 112(S1), S164-S187.
• Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic management journal, 21(6), 689-705.
• Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 674-698.
• Vickers, J., & Yarrow, G. K. (1988). Privatization: An economic analysis (Vol. 18): MIT press.
• Viscusi, W. K., Harrington Jr, J. E., & Sappington, D. E. (2018). Economics of regulation and antitrust: MIT press.
• Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: Some evidence. The journal of law and Economics, 26(3), 613-633.
• Weinrib, E. J. (2012). The idea of private law: Oxford University Press.
• Williamson, O. E. (1972). Economies as an anti-trust defense: The welfare tradeoffs. Readings in Industrial Economics: Volume Two: Private Enterprise and State Intervention, 111-135.
• Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. The journal of law and Economics, 22(2), 233-261.
• Williamson, O. E. (1983). Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. The American economic review, 73(4), 519- 540.
• Williamson, O. E. (1989). Transaction cost economics. Handbook of industrial organization, 1, 135-182.
• Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. The journal of law and Economics, 36(1, Part 2), 453- 486.
• Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance: Oxford university press.
• Williamson, O. E. (1998). Transaction cost economics: how it works; where it is headed. De economist, 146, 23-58.
• Williamson, O. E. (2002). The theory of the firm as governance structure: from choice to contract. Journal of Economic perspectives, 16(3), 171-195.
• Williamson, O. E. (2005). The economics of governance. American economic review, 95(2), 1-18.
• Williamson, O. E. (2016). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. In Institutional change (pp. 75-108): Routledge.

–

---

---

WEB – PAGE COUNTER